chadiacuo

In December 2011, the anniversary of the accession to this node, this reporter interviewed in Beijing, Wenzhou and interested parties, attempting to restore a shoe deal with anti-dumping litigation process. This is not merely a business or an industry battle. As the relations between China and its major trading partners from complementary to competitive and cooperative transformation, economic frictions and trade friction is bound to substantially increase in the future, dare and be adept in using the WTO's dispute  mens nike free run 3 settlement mechanism, safeguard national and enterprises increasingly highlight the importance of trading interests. Therefore, similar cases have a significance beyond winners and losers"This lawsuit must fight, lose, win, win, win! "The anti-dumping lawsuit for so long, until the end of March this year finally said goodbye. "December 8, known as" China's first anti-dumping lawyer, "Zhong LUN law firm lawyer Pu Lingchen, a partner in commenting on the past 5 years of experience, long Shu a sigh of relief. In his view, China's footwear industry is developing rapidly, consisting mainly of old shoe is a great threat to this country.

In 1995, the EU of its shoes in China soared from strict quotas imposed on China and Europe. On January 1, 2005, the formal conclusion of the transition period of China's entry into WTO for 3 years, the abolition of quota restrictionsBut Chinese shoes and failed to smoothly into the EU market, the same year, the EU started anti-dumping investigations. On October 7, 2006, the verdict imposed on Chinese leather shoe exports EU 16. 5% the high anti-dumping duties, for a period of two years. More than more than 1200 Chinese shoe are affected, is one of them"The alleged dumping is below cost price. The EU has not recognized China's market economy status, they chose Brazil as a third-party country, Brazil produced a pair of leather shoes production costs as the cost of China's shoe making a pair of shoes. "Pu Lingchen said that Brazil and China as" BRICS ", in labour costs, shoes-making technology and technology and shoe size there is a huge gap, Brazil produced a pair of shoes cost far more than the cost of Chinese shoe.

For businesses, the remedy could appeal to the European Court, also may be filed after the expiration of the administrative review. Pu Lingchen said: "an active litigation, is not just a win or lose, it is sending a signal from your actions, telling the EU shoe industry as well as the European Commission, we are not satisfied, while the EU and the European Commission cancellation of anti-dumping duties imposed by a certain pressure. It's October 2006 Pu Lingchen, Chairman of aokang met to talk about opinions. "Just a cup of coffee, Wang Zhentao decided to call this case"At that time, the outsiders have many questions about Acorn's decision. Aokang's export products 10% per cent of total sales, negligible effects of anti-dumping on it, why he decided to make such a campaign? Such an action delayed for two years, and probably finished until the lawsuit, tax time is over, still worth it? Coupled with little chance for companies to spend millions of dollars on whether it makes sense?